Alvarado v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *
Action for damages arising out of the use of a diving apparatus. Judgment for plaintiffs against defendant owner and in favor of defendant repairman against plaintiffs affirmed.
The defendant Anderson operated a “Fun Zone” which adjoins Balboa Bay, in the city of Newport Beach, and maintained a diving board apparatus offshore in the bay. On July 26, 1956, the plaintiff Timothy Alvarado was injured while using this apparatus, which consisted of three sectors joined together, constructed of metal pipe, and fastened to a float; each sector formed the base for a diving board…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. HaeusslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- United States v. Alexander SuttonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Alber v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.