Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1962No. Civ. 26512PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOURT, J.—

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action involving a rear-end collision.

Appellant filed a complaint wherein she charged in effect, among other things, that the corporate defendant Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Railroad) and Robert Livingston, a streetcar operator, had so negligently operated a streetcar as to cause it to collide with the rear portion of her automobile which she was driving; that further she had been severely injured as a consequence of the collision. The cause was tried before a jury.

A résumé…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Guerra v. BalestrieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. Nelson v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Continental Dairy Equipment Co. v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Brennan v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Kimball v. WhetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. San Diego Police Officers' Association v. San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Seheult v. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API