Hoyt v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FOURT, J.—
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action involving a rear-end collision.
Appellant filed a complaint wherein she charged in effect, among other things, that the corporate defendant Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority (hereinafter referred to as the Railroad) and Robert Livingston, a streetcar operator, had so negligently operated a streetcar as to cause it to collide with the rear portion of her automobile which she was driving; that further she had been severely injured as a consequence of the collision. The cause was tried before a jury.
A résumé…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Zuckerman v. Underwriters at Lloyd'sCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Guerra v. BalestrieriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Caccamo v. SwanstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Rather v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Nelson v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Continental Dairy Equipment Co. v. LawrenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Brennan v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Kimball v. WhetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- San Diego Police Officers' Association v. San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Seheult v. JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO, LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002