Legal Opinion

Jentick v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1941No. S. F. 16525PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

The city of San Francisco awarded a contract for the widening of a section of Nineteenth Avenue to Charles Harney. In performing the work, Harney's employees ripped up the pavement with a scarifier and removed the broken fragments with a steam shovel. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company maintained pipes and conduits in the avenue for the supply of gas to abutting residences. Throughout the project the Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s employees, including Alvin Parkhurst and John Mc-Grath, marked the location of pipes on the surface of the street, laid temporary surface mains, excavated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Yolo Water & Power Co. v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Benoit v. PerkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
  4. Snow Mountain Water & Power Co. v. KranerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Walsh v. StandartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mary M. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Lemons v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Lynch v. BirdwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API