Legal Opinion

Parker v. Womack

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1951No. L. A. 21842PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Loretta May Parker is suing for damages assertedly caused by the negligent operation of an automobile driven by Carl Womack. At the request of Womack, the jury was instructed that no recovery could be had if the accident were an unavoidable one. After the entry of judgment for Womack, a new trial was granted upon the ground that the instruction was prejudicially erroneous. The only question presented upon the appeal from that order concerns the propriety of the instruction.

Mrs. Parker alleged that she was driving her automobile in a northerly direction along Earl Avenue when it collided with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Polk v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Martindale v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Raliway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Scandalis v. JennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Merry v. Knudsen Creamery Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Vespe v. DiMarcoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  5. Conner v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1952

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API