Legal Opinion
Cordell v. Scott
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1961No. 9913-aPublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.
The trial of this personal injury action resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of defendant from which plaintiff appeals alleging error in an instruction to the jury.
In summarizing the material facts we do so in the light most favorable to the verdict. Accordingly, it appears the collision of automobiles in which the plaintiff, Katherine Cordell, was injured occurred at an intersection in the city of Watertown about 5 o’clock in the afternoon on February 5, 1959. Plaintiff was riding in the right front seat of a 1951 Oldsmobile owned and operated by her son-in-law, Raymond DeVille. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Butigan v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Lucero Ex Rel. Lucero v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Bridgman v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Miller v. AlveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Dartt v. BerghorstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Carpenter v. City of Belle FourcheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Alley v. SiepmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Stevens v. Wood Sawmill, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.