Nay v. Bernard
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHaven, J.
Plaintiff 'appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants in an action to establish a right of way, to restrain defendants from interfering therewith and to recover damages for prior interference. In 1894 the adjoining ranch properties of plaintiff and defendants were owned by Calvin H. Holmes and held by him as a single tract of land. In September of that year he divided this tract by conveying to his son-in-law, Charles H. Foote, the southerly portion thereof, which is now owned by defendants and is hereinafter referred to as the “Bernard property,” retaining title at that time in himself…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lampman v. . MilksNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Dennis v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Cheda v. BodkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Jersey Farm Co. v. Atlanta Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Owsley v. HamnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Millson v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.