Hopper v. Barnes
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying a new trial. R. F. Crawford, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Thomas Hopper is the father, and F. Roberts is the husband of Mary E. Roberts, and William Roberts, Edward Roberts, and Hubert Roberts are the minor children of F. Roberts and Mary E. Roberts.
This action was brought to recover damages alleged to have been suffered by plaintiffs in consequence of an obstruction by defendant of their alleged private right of way over the land of the defendant, and to enjoin the defendant perpetually from obstructing such way. The court found that plaintiffs had the alleged right of way and that defendant had obstructed it, and awarded the perpetual…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dennis v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Smith v. WornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gould v. StaffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spensley v. ValentineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
- De Celis v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Davis v. SkipperTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Wright v. BestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Nay v. BernardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.