Laux v. Freed
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
This is an appeal by defendants from only that portion of a judgment which purports to alter the terms of, and place limits on the use of a right of way granted by, a deed to them from plaintiffs, and which enjoins use of the right of way other than as limited by the judgment. We have concluded that the trial court's judgment results in varying the terms of the written grant, rather than merely interpreting it, and is without support in the record, and that the portion of the judgment appealed from should therefore be reversed. For convenience, plaintiff husband and defendant husband will…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Eastman v. PiperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,935 Vance L. Ragsdale v. John Frederick Haller AKA Fred HallerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Hembree v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.