Legal Opinion

Neon Signal Devices, Inc. v. Alpha-Claude Neon Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 12, 1931No. 2557PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSON, District Judge.

This litigation arises over letters patent No. 1806429, dated May 12, 1931, granted on the application of the inventor, William B. MeG-ill, to Neon Signal Devices, Inc., as assignee, covering a certain improvement in traffic signals.

The bill alleges infringement and prays for an injunction restraining the defendant from the manufacture, sale, or use of the patented device. The validity of the patent is not controverted, but infringement is denied because defendant claims it possesses an irrevocable, equitable license or shop right to manufacture, use, and sell the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. De Forest Radio Telephone Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ppg Industries, Inc., (77-3166), (77-3167) v. Guardian Industries Corporation, (77-3166), (77-3167)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. Gate-Way, Inc. v. HillgrenDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  4. Max C. McElmurry and White River Technologies, Inc. v. Arkansas Power & Light Company, Entergy Corporation and Middle South UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Toner v. SobelmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API