Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM 1'IIE CIRCUIT COURT QF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. In equity. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice Shirás
delivered the opinion of the court.
On November 26, 1884, Joseph M. Locke, this defendant in ■ error, filed ■ a bill in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, alleging infringement by the Lane & Bodley Company, a corporation of the State of Ohio, of letters patent No. 173,653, dated February 15, 1876, for an improvement in stop valves, issued to- said- Locke as inventor. The bill contained the usual allegations, and prayed for an injunction and other relief.
The answer, filed on January 24, 1885, denied that Locke was the original inventor,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Solomons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Hapgood v. HewittSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hammond v. Mason & Hamlin Organ Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Odetics, Inc. v. Storage Technology Corporation, Visa International Service Association, Inc., Visa Usa, Inc. And Crestar Bank, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Standard Parts Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.