Legal Opinion

Farmland Irrigation Co. v. Dopplmaier

California Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1957No. Sac. 6581PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Plaintiff in this action seeks a declaratory judgment that it is entitled to manufacture and sell irrigation equipment under a patent license agreement and a declaration of its duties under the royalty provisions of the license agreement.

Darrell C. Mansur invented certain improvements in agricultural sprinkling apparatus. He applied for a patent on his invention, and in the autumn of 1949, while his application was still pending, entered into negotiations with the Stout Irrigation Company, an Oregon corporation (hereinafter referred to as Stout), for the purpose of licensing Stout to…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. American Well Works Company v. Layne and Bowler CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Reichert v. General Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Thomson v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Ferreira v. FerreiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Essex Ins. Co. v. Five Star Dye House, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API