Hapgood v. Hewitt
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL i?KOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. cited: IliernY. Mill, 13 Yes. 114; Powell v. Spatdding, 3 Green, (Iowa,) 443 f Course v. Stead, 4 Dali..22; McClurg y. Kingsland, 1 How. 202; Continental Windmill 'Co. v. Em/pi/re Windmill Co., 8 Blatchford, 295; Gower y. Andrew, 59 Cal. 119; Grumley y. Webb, 1-4 Missouri, 444; Broohs y. Byam, 2 Story, 525; Wilson y.
Read the full summary
APPEAL i?KOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. cited: IliernY. Mill, 13 Yes. 114; Powell v. Spatdding, 3 Green, (Iowa,) 443 f Course v. Stead, 4 Dali..22; McClurg y. Kingsland, 1 How. 202; Continental Windmill 'Co. v. Em/pi/re Windmill Co., 8 Blatchford, 295; Gower y. Andrew, 59 Cal. 119; Grumley y. Webb, 1-4 Missouri, 444; Broohs y. Byam, 2 Story, 525; Wilson y. Stolhg, 5 McLean, 1; Goodyear y: Congress JUybber -Co., 3 Blatch-ford, 449; Goff v. Oberteuffer, 3 Phil. 71; Hartford v. Chip-man, 21 Conn. 488;…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blatciieoed
' This is a suit in equity brought in the Circuit Court of th, Hnited States for the District of Indiana, by Charles H. Hap-good, James IT. Hesse, and John Packer, trustees of Ilapgood 6 Company, a dissolved Missouri corporation, and the Ilap-good Plough Company, an Illinois corporation, against Horace ,L. Hewitt. The main object of the suit is to obtain from Hewitt 'the transfer of letters-patent granted to him for an invention. The defendant interposed a general demurrer to the bill,, for want, of equity.. The Circuit Court sustained the demurrer and dismissed the bill, 11 Bissell, 184, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McCLURG v. KINGSLANDSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Grand Chute v. WinegarSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Oliver v. Rumford Chemical WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Troy Iron & Nail Factory v. CorningSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Whiting v. GravesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Harris v. Emus Records Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Harry A. Pursche v. Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation, Atlas Scraper and Engineering Co., a Corporation v. Harry A. PurscheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.