McCLURG v. KINGSLAND
Supreme Court of the United States
This case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania.
Read the full summary
This case was brought up by writ of error from the Circuit Court of the United States for the western district of Pennsylvania. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court. .The.bill of exceptions which.was taken on the trial below was as follows; . And the plaintiff thereupon excepted to certain parts of the instruction's so given by the court to the jury,, which instructions so excepted to are hereinafter' set forth, to wit: «It has, however; been urged by the plaintiff’s counsel that the right to the continued1 use is restricted to the ‘ specific machine, manufacture,…
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baldwin
Phis cas.e comes here on a writ of error to the Circuit Court -for' the western district of Pennsylvania, in an action brought by the plaintiffs, assignees of James Harley, against the. defendants, for the' infringement of a patent granted to Harley for ¡an improvement in the . lode of casting chilled rollers and other metallic cylinders and cones, in. which judgment .was rendered for the defendants. On the trial it appeared in evidence that it had long been a desideratum to find out some mode by which iron rollers or cylinders,, could be so cast that when the metal was introduced into the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Shaw v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
3Cited by138 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser CorpSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Eldred v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Egbert v. LippmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.