Legal Opinion
Toner v. Sobelman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 6, 1949No. Civ. A. 6819PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge. -
In this action based upon defendants’ inequitable appropriation of the right to construct and use devices for mechanically trimming or storing grain in ships, and the patent thereof, the plaintiff seeks that the defendants be: (a) declared trustees ex maleficio of the devices, the patent, arid all profits and advantages gained by them as a result of their appropriation; (b) required to account for and pay over to him his share in the profits and savings derived from the devices and patent; and (c) . directed to reassign the patent to him, or be enjoined from assigning…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Gayler v. WilderSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- SI Handling Systems, Inc. v. HeisleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Kopin v. Orange Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California v. KielhornDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
- Aetna-Standard Engineering Co. v. RowlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.