Legal Opinion

United States v. Poole

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 3, 1997No. 96-1125; Crim.App. No. 95-0097PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

GIERKE, Judge:

A special court-martial composed of officer members convicted appellant, contrary to his pleas, of resisting apprehension and larceny, in violation of Articles 95 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 895 and 921, respectively. The adjudged and approved sentence provides for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 5 months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and sentence in an unpublished opinion.

Our Court granted review of the following issues:

I

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED TO…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Damatta-OliveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. WinbornUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  4. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. BurgessUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. CarruthersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. PrittCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  4. United States v. DearingNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. United States v. IveyArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API