United States v. Burgess
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted, among other things,1 of resisting apprehension by an armed forces policeman who was authorized to apprehend him, in violation of Article 95, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 895. The findings and sentence were affirmed by the Court of Military Review in a short-form opinion dated April 13, 1990.
Appellant petitioned this Court for further review, contending that his pleas of guilty for resisting apprehension must be set aside because his conduct constituted only flight, not resisting apprehension. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
- United States v. KlineUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- State v. PollackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. KlineU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. WillisUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. MaloneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. PrittNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.