Legal Opinion

Loftus v. Arizona State University Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Board

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 10, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0393PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises out of a ruling by the superior court affirming a decision by the Arizona State University Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local Board (“Board”) that salary received by a full-time ASU police officer, Charles Loftus, for teaching part-time at ASU was not part of his compensation for determining his retirement benefits under the Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (“System”). On appeal, Loftus argues ASU should have included his teaching salary in his System-eligible compensation because ASU was a System employer and he was a System…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Wyatt v. WehmuellerArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pendergast v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Tennenbaum v. Arizona City Sanitary DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  3. Bulk Transportation v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  4. Loftus v. Arizona State University Public Safety Personnel Retirement System Local BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API