Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Warner
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Chief Justice.
We granted review in this case to clarify the proper construction of the statute governing the discretionary award of attorney’s fees to successful litigants in contract actions, A.R.S. § 12-341.01. 1 Spe cifieally, we are called upon to resolve whether A.R.S. § 12-341.01 establishes a presumption that attorney’s fees be awarded in contract actions. We hold that it does not.
The issue arose in an action for declaratory relief instituted by Associated Indemnity Corporation (Associated) against Jack C. Warner and his wife to determine the scope of coverage under Warners’…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wistuber v. Paradise Valley Unified School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Title Insurance Co. of Minnesota v. Acumen Trading Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GranilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Autenreith v. NorvilleArizona Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by256 opinions
- Dennis v. O'Day v. McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Company, a Foreign Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Harris v. Maricopa County Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Gilbert v. Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
251 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.