Legal Opinion
Wyatt v. Wehmueller
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1991No. CV-89-0421-PRPublishedCited by 132 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GORDON, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs/appellants petitioned for review of a court of appeals’ decision affirming the trial court’s assessment of damages against plaintiffs pursuant to A.R.S. § 33-420(A) and attorney’s fees against counsel pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-349. We review only the assessment of damages against plaintiffs.1 See Rule 23, Ariz.R. Civ.App.P., 17B A.R.S. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Plaintiffs contracted on August 20, 1985 to purchase a large parcel of property from defendants/appellees,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United Bank v. Mesa N. O. Nelson Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by132 opinions
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Diana Glazer v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 2015
127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.