Legal Opinion

Pendergast v. Arizona State Retirement System

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 1, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 13-0244PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WINTHROP, Judge.

¶ 1 The Arizona State Retirement System (“ASRS”) appeals the decision of the superior court finding the 2011 legislative amendment to the public service credit purchase program violated ASRS member Bonnie Pendergast’s constitutional rights. We affirm because the public service credit purchase program was a public retirement system benefit when the voters passed Article 29, Section 1(C) of the Arizona Constitution, Pendergast’s eligibility under the program is therefore constitutionally protected from diminishment, and the 2011 legislative amendment unconstitutionally…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Fields v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. MT BUILDERS, LLC v. Fisher Roofing Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Ramsey v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Wade v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Lagerman v. AsrsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. Hall v. Elected Officials' Retirement PlanArizona Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API