Tennenbaum v. Arizona City Sanitary District
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are the following: (1) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) filed by Defendants Francis J. Slavin PC, Francis J. Slavin, and Carol J. Slavin (collectively “Slavin Defendants”); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment declaring A.R.S. § 12-752 unconstitutional (Doc. 13) filed by Plaintiff Michael E. Tennenbaum; and (3) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs under A.R.S. § 12-752 (Doc. 18) filed by Tennenbaum. For the reasons discussed below, all three motions are denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was the principal of Arizona City Development Corporation…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Backus v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Avid Telecom LLC v. FrankelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
- Mohiuddin v. SternDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022