Legal Opinion

Tennenbaum v. Arizona City Sanitary District

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 29, 2011No. CV-10-2137-PHX-GMSPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

G. MURRAY SNOW, District Judge.

Pending before the Court are the following: (1) Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 9) filed by Defendants Francis J. Slavin PC, Francis J. Slavin, and Carol J. Slavin (collectively “Slavin Defendants”); (2) Motion for Summary Judgment declaring A.R.S. § 12-752 unconstitutional (Doc. 13) filed by Plaintiff Michael E. Tennenbaum; and (3) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs under A.R.S. § 12-752 (Doc. 18) filed by Tennenbaum. For the reasons discussed below, all three motions are denied.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was the principal of Arizona City Development Corporation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Backus v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Avid Telecom LLC v. FrankelDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
  2. Mohiuddin v. SternDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API