Legal Opinion
Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 14, 1984No. 11258PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParskey, J.
On December 8,1983, this court decided that the judgment of the trial court was legally correct and could not be disturbed. The following is the full opinion of this court.
This case involves an administrative appeal from the action of the Stamford environmental protection board (EPB)1 approving the application of Standard Brands, Inc., and the Robert Martin Company for the development of a large tract of land in Stamford for use, inter alia, as a regional postal facility. In addition to the named plaintiff, the plaintiffs are the Better Neighborhood Association of Stamford (BNA) and ten…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Pizzola v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Welch v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Hotchkiss Grove Ass'n v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
3Cited by77 opinions
- Huck v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Agency of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Samperi v. Inland Wetlands AgencySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.