Legal Opinion
Sherman v. Sherman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 25, 1996No. 14552PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from a family support magistrate’s order. The trial court dismissed the appeal because it determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction. The defendant first claims that the trial court improperly dismissed his appeal upon determining that the appeal form filed did not *805fulfill the requirements of General Statutes § 46b-231 (n) (2). The defendant’s alternative argument is that § 46b-231 (n) (2) is unconstitutional.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts. On October…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rose v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Norwich Land Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carl J. Herzog Foundation, Inc. v. University of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Greene v. BynumConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Cagney v. Cagney, No. Fa 91 0390327-S (Jan. 5, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999
- Hanley-Turgeon v. Turgeon, No. Fa98-0547027 (Mar. 9, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
- Sender v. Sender, No. Fa94 0046243s (Mar. 9, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.