Legal Opinion
Armas v. City of Oakland
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 24, 1933No. Docket No. 8905PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Plaintiffs sued for damages as heirs of Louise Armas, who was killed when struck by an automobile operated by a member of the fire department of the defendant city. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and the plaintiffs had judgment for $5,000. The appeal is taken on typewritten transcripts.
The appellant presents four grounds of appeal—insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of negligence; insufficiency of the evidence to support the finding that deceased was not guilty of contributory negligence; excessive damages; and that section 1714½ of the Civil Code imposes no…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- City of Kansas v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Charles H. Duell, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Lucas v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Brown v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.