Legal Opinion

Lucas v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1938No. L. A. 16144PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff was a guest passenger in an automobile as it was being driven across a street intersection on its right side of the street, at a lawful rate of speed and in response to a mechanical “Go” signal. In the middle of the intersection a police automobile of defendant municipal corporation, operated upon authorized emergency business, traveling at a high rate of speed and disregarding the traffic “Stop” signal, crashed into it. Plaintiff, injured in the accident, was awarded damages of $2,000 against defendant upon trial before a jury. Defendant appeals.

There is no…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Lossman v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Saarinen v. KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Johnson v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Raynor v. City of ArcataCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API