Legal Opinion
Charles H. Duell, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 27, 1932No. Docket No. 8278PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
By this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages from the defendants arising out of the breach of a contract between plaintiff and defendant Lillian Gish. The claim against the defendants, other than Gish, is on the grounds that they and each of them, acting individually and in concert with defendant Gish, wrongfully caused and brought about the breach complained of. The cause was tried by jury and at the conclusion of the trial the court directed a verdict in favor of all of the defendants. Such a verdict was returned and judgment entered thereon. Thereafter the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Portland Gold Mining Co. v. Stratton's Independence, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Buckeye Powder Co. v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours Powder Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Coleman v. FarwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Staples v. HoefkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Blanche H. Lober v. Willis MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Clemens v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Armas v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.