Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Drum

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 2005No. B174248PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, Acting P. J.

In this suit for malicious prosecution, plaintiff Rochelle Bergman appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendant Joel Drum (Drum). Plaintiff contends that the trial court’s granting of Drum’s motion for summary judgment is inconsistent with our ruling in a previous appeal in this case and thus violates the doctrine of law of the case.

In our previous opinion 1 , we ruled that the trial court had properly denied Drum’s Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 “anti-SLAPP” motion to strike plaintiff’s complaint. We ruled that, as a matter of law, the evidence…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Kenne v. StennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Plumley v. MockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API