Bergman v. Drum
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
In this suit for malicious prosecution, plaintiff Rochelle Bergman appeals from a summary judgment granted to defendant Joel Drum (Drum). Plaintiff contends that the trial court’s granting of Drum’s motion for summary judgment is inconsistent with our ruling in a previous appeal in this case and thus violates the doctrine of law of the case.
In our previous opinion 1 , we ruled that the trial court had properly denied Drum’s Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 “anti-SLAPP” motion to strike plaintiff’s complaint. We ruled that, as a matter of law, the evidence…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Wilson v. Parker, Covert & ChidesterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- County of Los Angeles v. FausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Habash v. L.A Pacific Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- Contreras v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Kenne v. StennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Plumley v. MockettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.