Legal Opinion

Bigbee v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1983No. L.A. 31613PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

This appeal questions the correctness of a summary judgment entered in favor of four defendants in this personal injury action. The determinative issue is whether, under the evidence presented on the motion, foreseeability remains a question of fact for the jury. (See Weirum v. RKO General, Inc. (1975) 15 Cal.3d 40, 46 [123 Cal.Rptr. 468, 539 P.2d 36].)

I

On November 2, 1974, plaintiff, Charles Bigbee, was severely injured when an automobile driven by Leona North Roberts struck the telephone booth in which he was standing. Plaintiff thereafter brought an action for damages…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Ileto v. Glock Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API