Legal Opinion

Oviedo v. Windsor Twelve Properties, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 2012No. B237756PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

This is an appeal by Elvira Oviedo (appellant) of an order granting a special motion to strike each cause of action in her complaint pursuant to the anti-SLAPP1 statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16.2 Appellant contends that the trial court’s granting of the special motion to strike was in error as (1) respondents’ alleged illegal rent increase, the basis of her first cause of action, was not a protected activity, and (2) she established a probability of prevailing with respect to her malicious prosecution action. We agree with appellant and will reverse the order…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. DelfinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. San Diegans for Open Gov't v. San Diego State Univ. Research Found., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. DeCambre v. Rady Children's Hospital-San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Medley Capital Corp. v. Sec. Nat'l Guaranty, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Ben-Shahar v. PickartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Billauer v. Escobar-EckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API