Legal Opinion
Kenne v. Stennis
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 21, 2014No. B242262PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendants, appellants, and cross-respondents Kevin P. Stennis (Stennis) and his wife, Helaine Hatter (Hatter), 1 appeal from that portion of the trial court’s order denying, in part, their Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16 2 (anti-SLAPP statute 3 ) special motion to strike claims against them arising out of Hatter’s police reports and her filing of two civil harassment petitions under section 527.6 against plaintiff, respondent, and cross-appellant Kathleen A. Kenne (plaintiff). Plaintiff cross-appeals from that portion of the trial court’s order granting, in…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Julian v. Mission Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Okorie v. L. A. Unified Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- United Tactical Systems, LLC v. Real Action Paintball, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Broidy Capital Management, LLC v. State of QatarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Parisi v. MazzaferroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.