Legal Opinion

Murfee v. Porter

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1950No. Civ. 14154PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Murfee contracted with Doelger for the lease of a restaurant. The written lease gave Murfee an option to purchase the premises for $30,000, if such right were exercised at the end of the 30 months from the inception of the lease; otherwise, he was given the right to purchase for $35,000 during the next 30-month period. The first 30-month period expired on June 20, 1947. Prior to that date Murfee, through his agents, notified Doelger, or his agent, that he intended to exercise the option. Doelger, by his agent Porter, had deposited a deed in escrow on May 19, 1947. Various complications arose,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Walter G. Reese Co. v. HouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Smith v. PostCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Mariposa Commercial & Mining Co. v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Heine v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  2. Forest Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. United States v. Bethlehem Steel CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
  4. Riverside Fence Co. v. NovakCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. State of California v. AgostiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API