Heine v. Treadwell
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Lake County, from an order refusing a new trial, and from an order refusing to set aside the judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
This is an action of ejectment to recover a tract of land situated in Lake County.
Plaintiff had judgment, from which, and from an order dismissing and denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals, which appeal is No. 9693.
Subsequently defendant moved the court to set aside and vacate the judgment, upon the ground of “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect,” as provided by section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The motion was denied, and appeal No. 9694 is taken from the order denying such motion.
*219For convenience’ sake we shall consider the two appeals in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bakeman v. PoolerNew York Supreme Court · 1836
- Englander v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Dunham v. JacksonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
- McKinley v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Strong v. BlakeNew York Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pitt v. MallalieuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Murfee v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Barker v. McKellarIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Downer v. BuehrleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Victor Power and Mining Co. v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.