Riverside Fence Co. v. Novak
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of an option to sell certain real property.
The following facts are virtually undisputed:
On November 20, 1962, defendants leased subject property to plaintiff for a term expiring October 31, 1963, with an option to renew for two successive one-year terms. Plaintiff' exercised the renewal option for the two years extending the lease to October 31, 1965. The lease granted plaintiff an option to purchase the property for $29,000 on the following terms: $5,000 cash down, the assumption of an existing trust deed in-favor of Hemet…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Forest Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.