Legal Opinion

Riverside Fence Co. v. Novak

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1969No. Civ. 9071PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamura, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of an option to sell certain real property.

The following facts are virtually undisputed:

On November 20, 1962, defendants leased subject property to plaintiff for a term expiring October 31, 1963, with an option to renew for two successive one-year terms. Plaintiff' exercised the renewal option for the two years extending the lease to October 31, 1965. The lease granted plaintiff an option to purchase the property for $29,000 on the following terms: $5,000 cash down, the assumption of an existing trust deed in-favor of Hemet…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ellis v. MihelisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Robbins v. Pacific Eastern Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Hind v. Oriental Products Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Cates v. McNeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kofoed v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Erich v. GranoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Real Estate Analytics, LLC v. VallasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  4. Forest Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  5. C. Robert Nattress & Associates v. CidcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API