Walter G. Reese Co. v. House
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kern County. J. W. Mahon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
Demurrers to plaintiff’s third amended complaint and to its supplemental complaint were sustained without leave to amend, and judgment of dismissal entered. Prom this judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The plaintiff makes no point on the ruling with respect to the supplemental complaint. The only question is whether the demurrer to the third amended complaint should have been sustained.
After setting forth the corporate character of the plaintiff, the complaint in question alleges that on or about the sixteenth day of June, 1910, Elizabeth Wirth was the owner and in possession of three lots and of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. BanghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Brown v. Town of SebastopolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Beverage v. Canton Placer Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Warner Bros. Pictures v. BrodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Copple v. AigeltingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Western Securities Co. v. AtleeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.