Legal Opinion
Forest Properties, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 6, 1997No. 92-851LPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*60OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
This is a regulatory taking action brought by the plaintiff after the Federal Government acting through the United States Army Corps of Engineers denied a dredge and fill permit for the development of land owned by the plaintiff at Big Bear Lake in San Bernar-dino County, in southern California. Trial was held on September 9-12, 1996, at the United States Courthouse, Pasadena, California.
For the reasons that follow, the Court finds that the plaintiffs property was not taken in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Statement of Facts
The…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Forest Properties, Inc.(now Known as Rck Properties, Inc.) v. United States, and Big Bear Municipal Water DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- K & K Const. v. DnrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Florida Rock Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Brace v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.