State of California v. Agostini
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment decreeing specific performance of a contract to convey real property arising out of the alleged exercise of an option granted to respondent State of California by the terms of a lease.
In October, 1946, respondent and appellants entered into a lease under which the State of California rented an office building in Oakland from appellants for a 10-year period at a monthly rental of $4,800. An option to purchase the building at any time after the beginning of the seventh year of tenancy was granted by paragraph 9 of the lease for the sum of $250,000. According to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Estate of PlattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Trubowitch v. Riverbank Canning Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Andrews v. California Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Doak v. BrusonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Landberg v. LandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Northcutt v. McPhersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- Gardner v. SpurlockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
- Summit Industrial Equipment, Inc. v. Koll/Wells Bay AreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.