Legal Opinion
Welk v. Conner
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 3, 1929No. Docket No. 7117PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DO CLING, J., pro tem.
On November 13, 1913, Theodore J. Welk recovered two judgments in the Superior Court in separate actions in each of which the appellant Newton J. Skinner was a defendant. On March 14, 1927, Welk having died, his administrator procured from the Superior Court an order for the issuance of a writ of execution in one of these actions, No. B3694. Thereafter appellant moved the court for an order recalling and vacating said writ of execution and also for an order declaring such judgment satisfied under section 675 of the Code of Civil Procedure. These motions were denied and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moore v. CrawfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Mahoney v. BostwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Burt v. Los Angeles Olive Growers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Faias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Taff v. Atlas Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Long v. LongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.