Legal Opinion

Doehla v. Phillips

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1907No. L.A. No. 1893PublishedCited by 63 opinions

APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County directing the enforcement of a judgment and from an order denying a motion to recall the execution and vacate the former order. Waldo W. York, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

These are appeals from an order directing the enforcement of a judgment as against appellant and from an order denying a motion to recall the execution and vacate the former order.

The judgment was made December 30, 1891, and entered December 31, 1891, in favor of plaintiff and against appellant and one Carrie D. Phillips, for $518.25, then due under the terms of a promissory note given by the defendants as joint makers. Nothing was done in the matter of enforcing said judgment until March 10, 1905, when ex parte application was made to the superior court for an order allowing the enforcement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hunt v. LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Harrier v. BassfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Swamp Land District No. 307 v. GlideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Davis & McMillan v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Westphal v. WestphalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API