Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Harlan

California Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1908No. Sac. No. 1500PublishedCited by 49 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Yolo County denying a motion to set aside an order directing a divorced husband to pay a monthly sum of money for the support, education, and maintenance of his children, and directing execution to issue. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

¡8LOSS, J.

In May, 1891, the superior court of Yolo County entered a decree granting to Lena J. Harlan a divorce from W. C. Harlan. The decree awarded to the wife, plaintiff in the action, the custody of the three minor children of the parties, and awarded to her a portion of the community property. It was further decreed that “the property so awarded to plaintiff shall be in lieu of any further provision or alimony for her personal maintenance or support.”

In April, 1895, Lena J. Harlan filed in the same action a petition for an order requiring the defendant to pay her the amount theretofore…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erkenbrach v. . ErkenbrachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Howell v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Harrier v. BassfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McClure v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API