Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Bostwick

California Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1892No. 14638PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHe Haven, J.

— The complaint in this action alleges, among other matters, that in August, 1884, plaintiff was the owner of the land therein described, and at that date he executed to one William Inglis a deed thereof, as security for money then advanced by said Inglis to pay off a debt due from plaintiff to the Stockton Savings and Loan Society, and which indebtedness was a lien on said land; that, upon February 5, 1885, the defendant, by agreement with plaintiff, paid to said Inglis the amount then due from plaintiff to Inglis, and plaintiff, in consideration thereof, caused said Inglis to convey to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Henley v. HotalingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Coyle v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Cadman v. PeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Sheehan v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API