Legal Opinion

Long v. Long

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1946No. Civ. 15520PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

Feeling aggrieved by being required to satisfy a just obligation as the result of an order made pursuant to section 685 of the Code of Civil Procedure directing the issuance of an execution to enforce a judgment for alimony that has been accumulating for more than 14 years, none of which has been paid, defendant has appealed from the order. Since it is within the discretion of the court to determine whether the applicant for the issuance of an execution has stated sufficient reasons for having failed .to proceed under section 681 (§ 685, supra ; Corcoran v. Duffy, 18 Cal.App.2d 658 [64 P.2d…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Butcher v. BrouwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilkerson v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Reed v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Cordero v. CorderoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Shapiro v. CahillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Bank of America v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API