Legal Opinion
Harrisburg Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 30, 1954No. Appeals, 9 and 80PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
by Hirt, J.,
On September 12; 1951, Pennsylvania Power and Light Company (hereinafter referred to as the Company) filed supplements to its existing tariffs with Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The various supplements contemplated increases in tariffs applicable to 2,435 large .commercial, industrial and re*553sale customers, only. More than 500,000 other customers of the Company were not affected. Complaints were filed by the present appellants and by many others, which were consolidated for hearing with an investigation, instituted by the Commission of its own motion to determine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Scranton-Spring Brook Water Service Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. Alabama Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.