Legal Opinion
City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeals, Nos. 1 to 11PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
This is a rate case which had its inception on February 6, 1950, when Duquesne Light Company filed a new tariff (No. 10) with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The effective date was to be April 10, 1950. It was estimated that the effect of the proposed tariff would be an increase in annual. revenue of $7,'720,612. Complaints against the proposed tariff were filed by the City of Pittsburgh, Borough of Oakmont, City of McKeesport, City of Clarion, Vanadium Corporation of America, Universal-Cyclops Steel Corporation, St. Joseph Lead Company, and Crucible Steel…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Smith v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.