Legal Opinion
Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 24, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 62PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
The Riverton Consolidated Water Company and the United States of America (Departments of the' Army and the Navy) appeal from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission prescribing rates for water service. Riverton supplies water to army and navy installations.' ......
*6Riverton is a wholly owned subsidiary of Northeastern Water Company. It renders service in an area encompassing portions of Cumberland and York Counties, and provides water for the New Cumberland General Depot of the Department of the Army and for the Mechaniesburg Naval Supply Depot of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Graham v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Mechanic Falls Water Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.