Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 1951No. Appeals, Nos. 173 and 174PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
These appeals by the City of Pittsburgh are from the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of July 25, 1950, allowing further increases in fares for street railway, incline plane, and feeder and street car type bus service of Pittsburgh Railways Company,1 and for through-bus service of the Pittsburgh Motor Coach Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pittsburgh Railways Company.
On November 19, 1948, the Trustees of Pittsburgh Railways Company and of Pittsburgh Motor Coach Company filed tariff increases with the Commission under which the basic street car…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Aizen v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- L. S. Ayres & Co. Et Al. v. IPALCO Et Al.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Capital Improvement Board of Managers v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.