Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The South Pittsburgh Water Company, a private corporate entity, serves twenty-one boroughs and nine townships in the metropolitan area of South Hills lying south of the Monongahela River. In addition, the Company serves all or parts of nine wards of the City of Pittsburgh within that area. In October 1951 the Company filed with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission its tariff Number 11, providing for substantial increases in all of its metered water rates. The effective date of the tariff, by successive orders of the Commission, was extended for a total of nine months…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Solar Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Riverton Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.