Legal Opinion
Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeals, Nos. 117, 118, and 119, and Nos. 122 to 155PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Rhodes, P. J.,
The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, by its order of February 10, 1958, granted an increase in rates to The Manufacturers Light and Heat Company.1 The City of Pittsburgh and The Manufacturers Light and Heat Company have appealed. Each sets forth certain alleged errors in the findings and order of the commission. Several industrial customers have intervened as appellees.
*345This rate proceeding was instituted by Manufacturers on March 12, 1957, by the filing with the commission of supplements 2 and 3 to Tariff Gas — Pa, P. U. C. No. 44 providing for increases and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- West v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. General Telephone Co. of the SoutheastSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- UGI Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.