Legal Opinion
Rooney v. Barnette
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 1912No. 2,005PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
The parties will be designated as in the court below.
It is assigned as error that in the impanelment of the jury in the court below a challenge for cause interposed by plaintiffs to Juror John Derby was denied. The objection to the juror was that he was not an inhabitant of the district of Alaska, as required by section 170, c. 16, of the “Act making further provision for a civil government for Alaska and for other purposes,” approved June 6, 1900 (31 Stat. 321, 358, c. 786), and section 11, c. 4, of the “Act to define and punish criminals in the district of Alaska and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Erhardt v. BoaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Haws v. Victoria Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. United States Borax Co. v. IckesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Consolidated Mut. Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- United States v. North American Oil ConsolidatedDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1917
- Scoggin v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1948
- Ranchers Exploration and Development Co. v. Anaconda Co.District Court, D. Utah · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.