Richmond Mining Co. v. Rose
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. This was a proceeding under Rev. Stat. §§ 2325, 2326, to determine adverse claims to the possession of mineral lands in Nevada. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. By direction of the court the following explanatory map has been prepared to show the location of the several claims.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Millee
This is a writ of error to the Supreme Court of Nevada.
The case presents a conflict of mining claims.
The contest began in the State District Court for the County if Eureka, Nevada, by defendants in error filing in that court, as plaintiffs, a petition against the Richmond Mining Company. To save repetition and confusion, the parties will be mentioned in this opinion as they are throughout the record, and as they actually were in the State courts, namely, Rose and others as plaintiffs, and the Richmond Mining Company as defendant.
This petition or complaint was filed October 21, 1873. A…
2Cited by42 opinions
- Shoshone Mining Co. v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Cole v. RalphSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Waskey v. HammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.