Legal Opinion

Zimmerman v. Funchion

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1908No. 1,455PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

This was an action of ejectment tried before the court below by stipulation of the parties without a jury, and resulted in findings and judgment for the plaintiffs, who are the defendants in error here. The subject of the action is a strip of mining ground in the Fairbanks mining *83district of Alaska covered by Creek placer mining claim No. 6 Above Discovery on Dome Creek, under which the defendants in error claim, and by bench claim No. 6 First Tier Right Limit of Dome Creek, under which the plaintiffs in error claim. It is undisputed that the Creek claim was the prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jupiter Mining Co. v. Bodie Consolidated Mining Co.District Court, D. California · 1881
  2. Thompson v. SprayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Patterson v. HitchcockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
  4. McIntosh v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Howeth v. SullengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Donegan v. Baltimore & N. Y. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  2. Jones v. Wild Goose Mining & Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  3. Waskey v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  4. Cardoner v. Stanley Consol. Min. & Mill. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Idaho · 1911
  5. Adams v. Yukon Gold Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API